Case patterns
WikiBusines keeps a strict client-confidentiality policy, so this page shows delivery patterns rather than name-dropping — plus the proof points that are already public.
Anonymized delivery patterns
Public figure, notability borderline
Notability audit first; engagement proceeds only when independent coverage clears the bar — otherwise the audit fee converts into a source-building plan instead of a doomed draft.
Company page deleted years ago
Deletion-history forensics, then recovery through the proper review channels with new sourcing; 90-day monitoring window after restoration, 80% refund if three attempts fail.
Multilingual expansion
A page that exists in one language edition is rebuilt against the sourcing conventions of each target edition — not machine-translated; coverage spans 160+ editions.
Brand misrepresented in AI answers
Entity-accuracy work: canonical structured data, Wikidata hygiene, source alignment — measured by before/after sampling of assistant answers, never 'guaranteed placements'.
Public proof points
The clearest public artifact is the company’s own product line: the LLM Knowledge Hub product page shows a client hub (medical surgeon Valikhnovski) ranking in Google for its subject — the same architecture this hub uses. The clients page documents six anonymized precedents and the reference-check process offered to prospects.
Named, written-consent case studies with revision IDs would be stronger evidence than any pattern — the company is weighing that step; this hub will carry them if it happens.